[fosscomm] [Fwd: Letter to Secretary, DIT]

jitendra jituviju at gmail.com
Fri Jul 17 09:49:32 PDT 2009

Some confusion for me.in what Andrew wrote:

> it was felt that a review of the policy( which policy, which version  )was
> required due to the earlier (when?)representation,

> and that after the review it(revision or original policy) was found
> unsustainable.

> Also mentioned was the fact that there were a number of letters this time
> in support of open standards to counter the suggestion for multiple
> standards from NASSCOM and MAIT, and would provide sufficient reason to
> retain it (presumably 'single' and 'open' standard) without change.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fosscom.in/pipermail/network-fosscom.in/attachments/20090717/086da8f0/attachment-0002.htm>

More information about the network mailing list