[fosscomm] Help required to form FOSSCOM as analternate Industry and Civil Society body to NASSCOM

satyaakam goswami satyaakam at gmail.com
Fri Jul 10 21:49:59 PDT 2009

On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Raj Mathur<raju at linux-delhi.org> wrote:
> On Saturday 11 Jul 2009, Praveen A wrote:
>> [snip]
>> If you look at FOSSCOMM representation as a mandate to rule over the
>> FOSS community, then you are wrong. We don't want leaders here, but
>> representatives in the true spirit.
> Let's be very clear here -- all we're seeking at the moment is a
> representative (or representatives) to put our case forward at the Apex
> Body meeting on standards.  The chosen person will not automatically
> have any special role to play in any other activity that FOSSCOMM
> engages in.
> I seem to remember that at the Delhi meeting it was agreed that we would
> choose representatives for each engagement individually, depending on
> the nature and location of the engagement.  There was no discussion
> about have a single face embodying FOSSCOMM for the rest of the world to
> see and, speaking for myself, I feel strongly that it is not desirable
> to have one either.  We could even have multiple representatives at
> different times in a single engagement if warranted (by length,
> complexity or geographically diffuse nature of engagement).
That is my understanding as well after attending the meeting and
reading different threads on this list.


More information about the network mailing list